Why do we use Daltons for protein mass?

Molecular structure such as small molecules and proteins are typically measure in Daltons. Whereas larger structures are measure in grams. Here we explain why, and how these units they relate to each other? 

Molecular structure such as small molecules and proteins are typically measure in Daltons. Whereas larger structures are measure in grams. Have you ever through why, or what each scale would look like applied redundantly? We use both Daltons (Da) and grams (g) for mass, but they serve very different purposes depending on what we’re describing.

Atoms and molecules are incredibly light

A single hydrogen atom weighs about

$$\text{g}.$$

That’s such a tiny number that it’s impractical to use grams directly when talking about atoms or molecules; you’d constantly be dealing with huge exponents.

To make life easier, chemists and biochemists defined a new unit:

1 Dalton (Da) = the mass of one hydrogen atom (more precisely, 1/12 the mass of a carbon-12 atom).

So:

1 Da=1.6605×10−24 g.

That way, instead of saying “a water molecule weighs 3.0×10−23 g,” we can say “it has a mass of 18 Da.” Much easier to read and reason about.

kDa keeps biomolecules in human-friendly numbers

Proteins, for example, typically weigh thousands of Daltons.
Instead of writing:

64,000 Da,

We use:

64 kDa.64

This makes it straightforward to compare molecular weights at a glance — for instance:

• Insulin ≈ 6 kDa

• Hemoglobin ≈ 64 kDa

• Ribosome ≈ 2,500 kDa

Those numbers are intuitive for molecular biologists working at the molecular scale.

Very Brief History of the Dalton

Around 1803–1808, English chemist John Dalton proposed that all matter was made of tiny, indivisible atoms.

In the 1970s biochemists and molecular biologists started using the Dalton unit to describe molecular mass

IUPAC officially recognized “Dalton (Da)” as an accepted alternative name for the unified atomic mass unit (u) in 1993.

Grams (and kilograms) work best for macroscopic things

Once you’re talking about cells, tissues, or organisms, you’re dealing with huge collections of molecules. A single human cell weighs roughly 10−910^{-9}10−9 grams, and a human weighs ~70 kg.

At that point, grams and kilograms are convenient because they give manageable numbers — just like Daltons do for molecules.

Scale and convenience

To get an idea of the difference in size, if you scaled the earth down to measure 1 kg, a tiger would weigh 1 kDa. That's how hugely different they are. The physics is the same — only the notation changes to keep our numbers reasonable

Tiger  Earth from space

The table shows a spectrum of size and mass, translating the invisible architecture of biology into a continuum we can begin to visualize. The journey starts unimaginably small. A single water molecule measures just 0.28 nanometers across and weighs 3×10⁻²³ grams. It takes more than 30 sextillion molecules to fill a glass. Move up only a few nanometers, and entire worlds emerge, stil too small to comprehend: peptides folding like origami, proteins assembling into engines, and the DNA double helix; a mere 2 nm wide, yet carrying the full blueprint for an organism.

A few thousand times larger sits the adenovirus, roughly 90 nm in diameter and already tipping the mass scale at 200,000 kDa. By two micrometers, you reach the realm of organelles and bacteria; self-sufficient biochemical factories that weigh about 10⁻¹² grams. Within another order of magnitude, the biological world becomes visible through light microscopes: yeast cells, animal cells, and the strikingly large human egg cell, nearly 100 micrometers wide.

Then, biology scales into the tangible. A dust mite is visible but minute at 300 micrometers, while a fruit fly extends to millimeters. Beyond that, life’s complexity compounds in mass rather than size: mice, pigeons, cats, humans, elephants, and finally the blue whale — a living cathedral weighing around 150,000 kilograms.

What’s extraordinary is not only the size disparity, but the continuity. Every level — molecular, cellular, organismal — is built on the same chemistry, the same physics, the same principles of organization. A protein’s folding rules mirror those that give rise to tissue architecture and ultimately to ecological systems.

Seeing life laid out on a logarithmic scale underscores both its unity and diversity. The same forces that shape a protein’s pocket also shape a whale’s fin. Scale, in biology, is not a boundary — it’s a bridge that connects the invisible to the immense.

IMAGE IL-2 crystal structure CREDIT Wikimedia

Learn more about powerful technologies that are enabling research: